Capital Structure Theory – Modigliani and Miller (MM) Approach

Modigliani and Miller approach to capital theory, devised in the 1950s advocates capital structure irrelevancy theory. This suggests that the valuation of a firm is irrelevant to the capital structure of a company. Whether a firm is highly leveraged or has lower debt component, it has no bearing on its market value. Rather, the market value of a firm is dependent on the operating profits of the company.

The capital structure of a company is the way a company finances its assets. A company can finance its operations by either debt or equity or different combinations of these two sources. The capital structure of a company can have a majority of debt component or majority of equity, only one of the 2 components or an equal mix of both debt and equity. Each approach has its own set of advantages and disadvantages. There are various capital structure theories, trying to establish a relationship between the financial leverage of a company (the proportion of debt in the company’s capital structure) with its market value. One such approach is the Modigliani and Miller Approach.

Modigliani and Miller Approach

This approach was devised by Modigliani and Miller during 1950s. The fundamentals of Modigliani and Miller Approach resemble that of Net Operating Income Approach. Modigliani and Miller advocate capital structure irrelevancy theory. This suggests that the valuation of a firm is irrelevant to the capital structure of a company. Whether a firm is highly leveraged or has lower debt component in the financing mix, it has no bearing on the value of a firm.

Modigliani and Miller (MM) ApproachModigliani and Miller Approach further states that the market value of a firm is affected by its future growth prospect apart from the risk involved in the investment. The theory stated that value of the firm is not dependent on the choice of capital structure or financing decision of the firm. If a company has high growth prospect, its market value is higher and hence its stock prices would be high. If investors do not see attractive growth prospects in a firm, the market value of that firm would not be that great.

Assumptions of Modigliani and Miller Approach

  • There are no taxes.
  • Transaction cost for buying and selling securities as well as bankruptcy cost is nil.
  • There is a symmetry of information. This means that an investor will have access to same information that a corporate would and investors would behave rationally.
  • The cost of borrowing is the same for investors as well as companies.
  • Debt financing does not affect companies EBIT.

Modigliani and Miller Approach indicates that value of a leveraged firm ( a firm which has a mix of debt and equity) is the same as the value of an unleveraged firm ( a firm which is wholly financed by equity) if the operating profits and future prospects are same. That is, if an investor purchases shares of a leveraged firm, it would cost him the same as buying the shares of an unleveraged firm.

Modigliani and Miller Approach: Two Propositions without Taxes

Proposition 1: With the above assumptions of “no taxes”, the capital structure does not influence the valuation of a firm. In other words, leveraging the company does not increase the market value of the company. It also suggests that debt holders in the company and equity shareholders have the same priority i.e. earnings are split equally amongst them.

Proposition 2: It says that financial leverage is in direct proportion to the cost of equity. With an increase in debt component, the equity shareholders perceive a higher risk to for the company. Hence, in return, the shareholders expect a higher return, thereby increasing the cost of equity. A key distinction here is that proposition 2 assumes that debt-shareholders have upper-hand as far as the claim on earnings is concerned. Thus, the cost of debt reduces.

Modigliani and Miller Approach: Propositions with Taxes (The Trade-Off Theory of Leverage)

The Modigliani and Miller Approach assumes that there are no taxes. But in the real world, this is far from the truth. Most countries, if not all, tax a company. This theory recognizes the tax benefits accrued by interest payments. The interest paid on borrowed funds is tax deductible. However, the same is not the case with dividends paid on equity. To put it in other words, the actual cost of debt is less than the nominal cost of debt because of tax benefits. The trade-off theory advocates that a company can capitalize its requirements with debts as long as the cost of distress i.e. the cost of bankruptcy exceeds the value of tax benefits. Thus, the increased debts, until a given threshold value will add value to a company.

This approach with corporate taxes does acknowledge tax savings and thus infers that a change in debt equity ratio has an effect on WACC (Weighted Average Cost of Capital). This means higher the debt, lower is the WACC. This Modigliani and Miller approach is one of the modern approaches of Capital Structure Theory.

Last updated on : December 23rd, 2016
What’s your view on this? Share it in comments below.


  1. Kendy
  2. Sara
  3. Datta
  4. Priya
  5. MBA
  6. agam bhasin
  8. Ahmed
  9. BA(Hons) Acc & Fin
  10. bhupinder kour
  11. infas mohamed
  12. Ilyas khan
  13. youns shah
  14. chhotu
  15. Ahmad
  16. Amit Singh Dangi
  17. rohit gupta
  18. Dipak bk

Leave a Reply

Capital Structure Theory – Net Income Approach
  • Net Operating Income Approach
    Capital Structure Theory – Net Operating Income …
  • Financial Leverage
    Financial Leverage
  • Operating Leverage and Degree of Operating Leverage
    Operating Leverage
  • Capital Structure and its Theories
    Capital Structure and its Theories
  • Subscribe to Blog via Email

    Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

    Join 122 other subscribers

    Recent Posts

    Find us on Facebook

    Related pages

    shortly meaning in hindiexternal commercial borrowings guidelinesdisofgdr pptcalculating rocecapitalisation of expensessolve for irrirr disadvantagesratio analysis advantagesirr interpolation formulabep formula in unitsmarket value of debenturesroa analysisreceivables turnover formulaprofit maximization hypothesiswhats a bill of ladingtrade and cash discount calculationirr calcualtioncreditor turnover periodweaknesses of irradvantages and disadvantages of npv methoddef liabilitylease purchase cars explainedratio analysis on financial statementswhat is an asset accounting definitionoperating levergeinventory turnover ratio by industrylc clausesadvantages and disadvantages of inventory managementdebit vs credit accountingdifferent types of mergers and acquisitionsfvifa tablenpv of bondnpv vs irrequity valuation dcfaccounts receivable turnover analysisdifference between credit and debit in accountingtypes of convertible bondsimportance of capital budgeting decisionscrediting definitionstakeholders advantages and disadvantagesirr interpolationmeaning of explicit costoperating profit vs net incomefixed cost and variable cost examples for manufacturingdiscounted pay back periodoperating lease vs financing leaseadvantages of dcfwealth maximization and profit maximizationsolvency ratio asset basedaccount receivable ratio formulabank overdraft current liabilitybank guarantee invocationwhat are liquid assets examplesdefinition of lessor and lesseewhat is the difference between shares and debenturesfccbthe payback methodfinance lease receivableconvertible bond put optionaccounts receivable turnover exampleinterpreting liquidity ratioscost approach formulagdr & adrbasic earning per share formularequired rate of return calculator for stocksdebtors formulaaccounts receivable turnover formulapretax cost of debt formuladebtors account receivable